When an airline transfers a flight voucher to another airline, that airline returns the coupon – and the corresponding value – to the original airline for payment (IATA Revenue Accounting Manual 2.5.1). Therefore, if, in the event of a change of booking, the (new) operator only receives the rate initially paid, why do the airlines not abuse this system? A FIM is usually issued at a door, ticket office or transit counter by an airline agent and notes its original line and ticket numbers as well as those of the new route, making the FIM a new ticket. A FIM is only valid for a specific flight with a new airline that is not the airline for which the ticket was originally issued. For example, a delta-Gate agent could create an FIM for a flight with United and send the data to United. The FIM would then be accepted as a regular ticket on the United flight indicated. I think people should know that there are many, many underlying interline agreements. Many date back to the 1960s and 1970s, long before alliances. Interline agreements cover many, many different services. Pocket control and rehousing are just the ones most flyers are aware of. For example, some airlines take over the original airline free of charge. Yes, that is always the case.
What I get is that a lot of airlines work together behind the scenes, as dashing as the aviation industry. While alliances with normal daily functioning have a lot of weight, in irropable, especially internationally, everything can be thrown out the window. But what is even more surprising is that airlines that normally do not have connections, make exceptions and issue tickets, buy tickets to bring passengers to their destination. But don`t expect this to happen if your ticket was on an error fee, etc. All airlines take erroneous airline tickets like poison when they are hit. I would imagine that an airline regularly booked passengers to other airlines when there is a slight load, which does not make the flight profitable. Especially on busy lines, where the delay will be minimal, why is this not common? It seems that the original bearer loses nothing with such a practice? Air India and Vistara have terminated with the airline the “Flight Disruption Manifesto(FIM)” agreement or the interline ticketing agreement. According to media reports, Vistara has also entered into an FIM agreement with the airline. A company spokesman said: “Vistara has not shared the seats of the FIM agreement with Jet Airways.
However, an Interline ticketing establishment has been dismissed for internal reasons. Flight disruptions are seen as increasingly unsymusely by both air passengers and airlines, particularly given the widespread use of electronic tickets or electronic tickets. The production of an FIM requires that the e-ticket be converted into a normal paper ticket and that the data be sent manually to the receiving airline.